The International Simutrans Forum

 

Author Topic: Plane Pak  (Read 43700 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline prissi

  • Developer
  • Administrator
  • *
  • Posts: 9353
  • Languages: De,EN,JP
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #70 on: October 21, 2008, 04:45:36 PM »
Well, the offset did not work properly (at least for x) until some nightly about three month ago.

Offline maister

  • *
  • Posts: 78
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #71 on: November 02, 2008, 11:48:20 AM »
Quote
New runways (among other airport stuff) are about 99% done. Patience my friends, patience!
@DirrrtyDirk; No joke ?? *thats really good news* How is the status now?

@Zeno
Also would be very nice is a privat Aircraft for 6-10 Pax (passengers) like the Learjet 60 VistaJet.
You will find all datas for it on Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learjet_60
(for the gameplay the running-costs must be very low to be profitable)

Offline DirrrtyDirk

  • Devotees (Inactive)
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • JR 700 Series Shinkansen
  • Languages: EN,DE
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #72 on: November 02, 2008, 01:12:21 PM »
Nope, no joke. I'm serious. But I haven't worked on it since... so status hasn't changed.

Offline ariarinen

  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #73 on: November 02, 2008, 04:49:03 PM »
@DirrrtyDirk; No joke ?? *thats really good news* How is the status now?

@Zeno
Also would be very nice is a privat Aircraft for 6-10 Pax (passengers) like the Learjet 60 VistaJet.
You will find all datas for it on Wikipedia : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Learjet_60
(for the gameplay the running-costs must be very low to be profitable)
I like that private jet would be good for some routes, I think the hawker 800 looks nicer 

Offline maister

  • *
  • Posts: 78
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #74 on: November 02, 2008, 05:20:28 PM »
@ariarinen; For me it is also ok.  :D  I need any privat jet for develop my airports with a section for small aircrafts. (only for the optical value of my big sandbox for adults)  ;D

@DirrrtyDirk; Oh, come on, only 1% left !!!!  ;) After I would post some very nice screenshots of airports, in devotement to you !  ;D

Offline ariarinen

  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #75 on: November 03, 2008, 03:27:01 PM »
@ariarinen; For me it is also ok.  :D  I need any privat jet for develop my airports with a section for small aircrafts. (only for the optical value of my big sandbox for adults)  ;D
me two and to connect low density routs to my A380 hub, it would also be good for mail   

Offline DirrrtyDirk

  • Devotees (Inactive)
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • JR 700 Series Shinkansen
  • Languages: EN,DE
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #76 on: November 03, 2008, 09:14:34 PM »
Yes... but a) I only work on ST if I feel like it, b) the last 1% is the most complicated and c) since this adds exactly zero functionailty but is only a graphic update instead, I don't feel any urgency.

Offline Combuijs

  • Web Team
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 1392
  • Maintainer of maps.simutrans.com
    • Combuijs
  • Languages: EN, NL
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #77 on: November 03, 2008, 10:44:40 PM »
Quote
the last 1% is the most complicated

Yeah, the last 1% usually takes 50% of the time ;).

Offline maister

  • *
  • Posts: 78
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #78 on: November 04, 2008, 08:18:25 PM »
Ok, that is a clear statement; it`s done when it`s done...
How is the status now?  ;D  ;)

Offline DirrrtyDirk

  • Devotees (Inactive)
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • JR 700 Series Shinkansen
  • Languages: EN,DE
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #79 on: November 05, 2008, 12:04:55 AM »
How is the status now?  ;D  ;)
Annoyed?

Offline maister

  • *
  • Posts: 78
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #80 on: November 05, 2008, 05:22:07 AM »
Quote
Annoyed?

No, why? It`s only like Christmas with a unknown date  ::) maybe a little bit nasty ;)

Offline DirrrtyDirk

  • Devotees (Inactive)
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • JR 700 Series Shinkansen
  • Languages: EN,DE
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #81 on: November 05, 2008, 03:37:15 PM »
I didn't mean to ask if you were annoyed. Maybe I should have written "Don't know. Maybe annoyed?" as reference to the status, instead. Because I am starting to get annoyed by this pestering.  >:(

Offline VS

  • Senior Plumber (Devotee)
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 4855
  • Vladimír Slávik
    • VS's Simutrans site
  • Languages: CS,EN
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #82 on: November 05, 2008, 03:46:09 PM »
Perhaps I should mention I have the files and can do the last 1%, too. Only I have more to do before I get to that.

(Now the load should reduce by 50% ;D )

Offline DirrrtyDirk

  • Devotees (Inactive)
  • *
  • Posts: 1253
  • JR 700 Series Shinkansen
  • Languages: EN,DE
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #83 on: November 05, 2008, 03:50:41 PM »
Well, you have the files for the taxiways, but not for the runways.  ;)

Offline maister

  • *
  • Posts: 78
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #84 on: November 05, 2008, 04:51:54 PM »
@DirrrtyDirk
You know.. very importent personens would be always badger.  :D
Maybe you need some bodyguard!  :police:

But now.. back to work....  ::)

And I would not disturb you again, i promise (in this case)  ;)

Offline ariarinen

  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #85 on: December 29, 2008, 05:15:30 PM »
I think that the 777-F would be good big freighter to have as it should be cheaper to run then the 4 engine A380. 

Offline Zeno

  • ENASSA Designer
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 1997
    • Zeno's Simutrans Creations
  • Languages: ES, EN, CAT
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #86 on: January 07, 2009, 03:34:07 PM »
I think that the 777-F would be good big freighter to have as it should be cheaper to run then the 4 engine A380. 
Yes, quite cheaper but smaller... I might draw a freighter version when I get back to the planes (hope soon).

Offline ariarinen

  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #87 on: January 07, 2009, 04:11:55 PM »
Yes, quite cheaper but smaller... I might draw a freighter version when I get back to the planes (hope soon).
Yes it gets a bit smaller but good replacement for the A300/310's. But there is already a 787F that could do the job as well so maybe its not so important. Maybe smaller planes are better right now when there is just a few of them, maybe a RJ like E-170/190 or CRJ-900 or Superjet 100, Saab 2000. A330 and A350 would also be nice to have. 

Offline Zeno

  • ENASSA Designer
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 1997
    • Zeno's Simutrans Creations
  • Languages: ES, EN, CAT
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #88 on: January 25, 2009, 03:14:47 PM »
After a long time I've decided to work in planes again. I've been thinking on it, and decided to make it step-by-step. I'll be working at it for the next weeks, but it will take me some weeks to finish this, as I have tons of work here and there. So I'll release version 2.0 for all planes in my PlanePak.

Btw, I've decided to begin with the A380 models. I've made a re-paint on them, basically repairing some rebel pixels, adding night and other lights, and adapting the liveries. Also did some realignment work. Now liveries are in player colors, but with the original schemas: Singapore Airlines for passenger service, UPS livery for post and goods services, and my custom livery for cooled goods service. I hope you like and enjoy them :)

PS: Here you have some in-game captures.


[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline jamespetts gb

  • Simutrans-Extended project coordinator
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 18038
  • Cake baker
    • Bridgewater-Brunel
  • Languages: EN
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #89 on: January 25, 2009, 04:52:10 PM »
Looking very nice! Any chance of an opensource release? ;-)

Offline Zeno

  • ENASSA Designer
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 1997
    • Zeno's Simutrans Creations
  • Languages: ES, EN, CAT
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #90 on: January 25, 2009, 05:02:45 PM »
Any chance of an opensource release? ;-)
100% chance they will, don't care, but when appropiate. There's still a lot of work on these. :)

Offline jamespetts gb

  • Simutrans-Extended project coordinator
  • Devotee
  • *
  • Posts: 18038
  • Cake baker
    • Bridgewater-Brunel
  • Languages: EN
Re: Plane Pak
« Reply #91 on: January 25, 2009, 05:04:03 PM »
Excellent! There's no harm in releasing opensource before they're fully finished, of course... ;-)