Bridge gliches

[fam621]

I am getting sicker and sicker of this now James. Infact this time bridges below 96 km/h are placed with the motorway (115 km/h) road.

[Ves]

You might be able to give some  more details? Are the ways on top of bridges downgraded to a lower speed limit (ie, a 155km/h road is 'upgraded' to a 96km/h road)?

[fam621]

Its road bridges BTW

[Ves]

Its road bridges BTW

You already said that :

... placed with the motorway (115 km/h) road.

However, if that matters or not, I dont know, but I still think you need to produce some more information, if James should have a tiny chance of looking into it.

Also:

I am getting sicker and sicker of this now James

Is not very nice to say. I dont recall that you have mentioned this before, so how is James supposed to know that this is a problem? Please, if you have a problem with the software, just state that there is an issue and how to reproduce the problem, instead of complaining how bad things are.
After all, this forum is supposed to encourage people with constructive and positive comments, not demotivate people by negative comments

[jamespetts]

I have only just noticed this thread, as my e-mail notifications seem to work only intermittently, for some reason.

Do you mean that when you place a bridge with a maximum speed of 96km/h, the road on top of the bridge is motorway? If so, then all that you need to do to prevent this is select a different road type from the road tools menu first. Bridges and tunnels are now built with the last way selected to enable players to choose what sorts of ways are built on and in their tunnels and bridges. This is intended. Without this, players might waste money by placing a bridge or tunnel and immediately have to replace the way (road, track, etc.) on that bridge or in that tunnel with a different one.

[fam621]

Have you updated the devel new builds to allow for that change yet?

[jamespetts]

I am not the one who distributes the executables, so I am not sure; however, I made this change a few weeks ago, so I think that this will have been in the latest builds by now.

Do you find that this behaviour does not in fact occur for you? If so, it would help me to know the revision number (the new version number system recently added) of the version that you are using, or, if you cannot find that, the build date.