Hello James
Last 11.x branch
file: dataobj/einstellungen.cc, line 1898/1897, there are two lines (add in one of last commits):
unprotect_abondoned_player_months = contents.get_int("unprotect_abondoned_player_months", unprotect_abondoned_player_months );
unprotect_abondoned_player_months = contents.get_int("unprotect_abandoned_player_months", unprotect_abondoned_player_months ); // Correcting spelling error.
Giuseppe
See the tiny difference:
unprotect_abondoned_player_months = contents.get_int("unprotect_abondoned_player_months", unprotect_abondoned_player_months );
unprotect_abondoned_player_months = contents.get_int("unprotect_abandoned_player_months", unprotect_abondoned_player_months );
both spellings of the setting are read to keep backward compatibility. This is now also fixed in standard.
Thank you for pointing this out, but Dwachs is correct: it is intentional.
Dwachs - presumably the fix in Standard has a similar effect?
Quote from: jamespetts on July 25, 2013, 08:28:21 PM
Dwachs - presumably the fix in Standard has a similar effect?
Yes, implementation is similar, I only took the freedom to correct the variable name as well.