The International Simutrans Forum

Development => Bug Reports => Topic started by: Yona-TYT on March 05, 2014, 01:07:13 PM

Title: The costs of climate edit
Post by: Yona-TYT on March 05, 2014, 01:07:13 PM


There a costs for editing the climate even though nothing is changed.
(https://www.mediafire.com/convkey/4c8d/1vxl4zaaf47eqjw6g.jpg)
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: prissi on March 06, 2014, 05:21:09 PM
Somebody still has to go there and check. Consultant charge is much more than the money for the actual work nowadays ... ;)
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: Ters on March 06, 2014, 05:32:10 PM
So before long a new feature in Simutrans will randomly decline to build roads, as they are deemed unprofitable, but still subtract about half the construction cost from the bank balance? (At least when using the public player.)
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: prissi on March 06, 2014, 09:47:13 PM
Joking aside, I am still waiting for the SVN to submit fixes. Then I will also work on this.
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: Yona-TYT on March 29, 2014, 09:35:25 PM
Is there any solution for this?  ???
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: Yona-TYT on March 31, 2014, 02:04:41 AM
 ??? ...??
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: prissi on March 31, 2014, 04:11:13 PM
If you find this important, submit a patch. Not high priority for me currently. Do stupid stuff and you get charged. Same as for deletion of sheeps etc. or building houses.
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: Yona-TYT on April 01, 2014, 03:22:34 AM

Quote from: prissi on March 31, 2014, 04:11:13 PM
If you find this important, submit a patch. Not high priority for me currently. Do stupid stuff and you get charged. Same as for deletion of sheeps etc. or building houses.
I know that it  it comes to something stupid, but it's always good to think about novice players... :police:
Title: Re: The costs of climate edit
Post by: kierongreen on April 01, 2014, 12:00:42 PM
Editing climates is not core gameplay. It's a public player function really so cost isn't a huge issue. Hence it not being a priority.