The International Simutrans Forum

Community => Community Discussion => Randomness Lounge => Topic started by: Isaac Eiland-Hall on January 30, 2026, 01:53:56 PM

Title: A pity we don't have reversing…
Post by: Isaac Eiland-Hall on January 30, 2026, 01:53:56 PM
Scrolling through reddit and found a funny post:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Factoriohno/comments/1qr0niq/theres_gotta_be_an_easier_way_to_turn_trains/

(https://i.imgur.com/oQwujp1.png)
https://i.imgur.com/oQwujp1.png

It's about how to turn a train around, but it's not the most efficient way - it's a silly joke.

But stuff like that would be fun to deal with in Simutrans.

I mean, I think it's better that trains do turn themselves around since a tile is also 1km¹.... but still, this would be fun to model as well :)
Title: Re: A pity we don't have reversing…
Post by: Octavius on February 24, 2026, 02:49:48 PM
Essentially a back-feeding turning heptagram. I'm not aware of any in real life, but turning pentagrams do exist. There's one in Carbonia (Sardegna, Italy; no longer used) and in Mals (Trentino, Italy). Triangles a.k.a. wyes are more common. I expect this heptagram will be even more compact than a pentagram, but there comes a point where a turntable is the cheaper solution.

In this case the train alternates between doing 45 degree turns, bypassing the exact centre, and straights, going through the exact centre, giving a very complex centrepiece. But if 45 degree turns are acceptable, better make that 36 degree symmetrical turns and turn (!) it into an ordinary turning pentagram.