The International Simutrans Forum

PakSets and Customization => Pak64 => Pak64 Bug Reports => Topic started by: Colin on September 22, 2009, 10:05:41 AM

Title: Shipyards
Post by: Colin on September 22, 2009, 10:05:41 AM
It would appear that the Ship Depots are missing or not showing in r2650.
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Dwachs on September 22, 2009, 10:57:28 AM
hm. It does work for me (an old pak64 installation with trunk rev 2659).
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Colin on September 22, 2009, 01:46:56 PM
hm. It does work for me (an old pak64 installation with trunk rev 2659).
I copied the ship depots from an older PAK and they work fine, tried again with r2650, no luck. But hey! if r2659 is out and works, who cares about r2650?LOL
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Dwachs on September 22, 2009, 04:31:58 PM
:D

Could you specify what exactly did not work? no menu icon, buildings disappear etc? Could you upload the offending pak's?
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Colin on September 23, 2009, 06:20:12 AM
:D

Could you specify what exactly did not work? no menu icon, buildings disappear etc? Could you upload the offending pak's?


When you open the Ships Icon there are no Depots neither the left or right hand one. Can't upload them I've over written them from a previous version. But it was r2650

Edit:
Sorry, I think I missled you with this It was not the Nightly Revision it was the new PAK 182.
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Dwachs on September 23, 2009, 10:42:08 AM
Sorry, I think I missled you with this It was not the Nightly Revision it was the new PAK 182.
Ah ok :) But then your bug report should go into the pak 281 board 8)
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: DirrrtyDirk on September 23, 2009, 11:39:51 AM
I think he's talking about pak64 r182 - he didn't misspell "pak128", so he's quite right here, wouldn't you agree?  ;)
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Dwachs on September 23, 2009, 12:09:45 PM
 ;D
Title: Re: Shipyards
Post by: Colin on September 23, 2009, 06:31:10 PM
I think he's talking about pak64 r182 - he didn't misspell "pak128", so he's quite right here, wouldn't you agree?  ;)

Thank you Dirk, you are quite right I did mean PAK 64 r182. I sometimes forget in my doteage that I should write and speak in words of not more than two syllables. ;D ;D