Started by Sarlock, April 09, 2013, 12:58:14 AM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Fabio on July 04, 2013, 05:30:12 PMI'm still thinking about rail tracks. In a way, I would like to get rid of the raised ballast (like other paksets did) replacing it with a flat one. PROs: - look better when double tracks- more clearance in tunnels/under bridges- better interoperability with trams, having the same tracksCONs:- rail vehicles need repositioning (easily done with a script to add vertical offset ~4px)- catenaries need adjusting (anyway they would need a revamp sooner than later)I would like to hear your opinions on the matter...
Quote from: prissi on July 06, 2013, 10:31:14 PMMaybe paset dependent offsets in simuconf.tab could be a better choice.
Quote from: Fabio on July 07, 2013, 10:25:09 PMa way to add -say- a 0,4 (x,y) offset to all rail vehicles via simuconf.tab
Quote from: kierongreen on July 08, 2013, 03:43:13 PMRail vehicle addons might need realigning if Fabio decides rail tracks need to be realigned.
Quote from: kierongreen on July 10, 2013, 02:35:21 PMDiagonal crossings can be achieved with tram tracks.