Started by jamespetts, March 31, 2009, 04:06:31 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: The Hood on March 31, 2009, 04:58:28 PMJames, no offence intended here or anything but I can't really tell whether that's a good idea or not because of the sheer length of that post! It sounds good, but each time I read it I reach overload about a quarter of the way through! Any chance you could summarise it for ease of digestion?
Quote from: prissi on March 31, 2009, 07:30:20 PMImho the only meaningful measure could be intermediate stops, which is still on my todo list.
Quote from: prissi on April 01, 2009, 08:49:57 PM@z9999
Quote from: prissi on April 01, 2009, 08:49:57 PM@z9999Recording the intermediate stops is simple. However, then the loading routines need chages too, since then the goods should only load into the convoi with this number of intermediate stops.
Quote from: prissi on April 02, 2009, 01:30:47 PM@gerwBut then there will bi never loaded goods at A for a line A-B-C because in A C is not know?!?
Quote from: TrainMith on June 09, 2009, 06:24:20 AMIs there anything else needed to be done during the compiling of the simutrans executable than the PROFILE=1? I also am assuming that the gmon.out would be placed directly in the same directory as the executable, under linux.
Quote from: gerw on April 01, 2009, 07:08:49 AMI think, this isn't hard to include. Therefore you have only to add the stops to warenziel, which are directly reachable from that station (without intermediate stops). Then, of course, you have to increase the number of transfers and you have to take care, what to do with passengers at intermediate stops.
Quote from: z9999 on June 12, 2009, 01:48:04 PMDoes this need doubled calculation for both outward and return ? Because shortest route is not always shortest for return route.
Quote from: gerw on June 12, 2009, 05:01:34 PMDo you have changed anything in the loading/unloading procedure (vehikel_t::[be/ent]laden)?