Started by freddyhayward, September 16, 2020, 11:45:28 PM
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Ranran on September 17, 2020, 03:49:00 AMDoes that mean that the length of the convoy exceeds the required length?In extended it should be "no route". Therefore it cannot stop at the station.It may be because I fixed an issue that caused no route due to incorrect length calculation.Do bulk vehicles have a "mix load prohibition"? In the case of that option, processing may have been skipped.
QuoteI did not get a "<convoy> is too long for its next stop" message.
Quote from: Ranran on September 20, 2020, 12:20:37 PMI may not understand the description of prissi correctly and this can be a complex issue related to the standard specification. It is recommended to have a margin of 0.5 tiles when incorporating a small wagon into the convoy.In any case, if this problem is not resolved, the recombination system will have major problem.
Quote from: freddyhayward on September 20, 2020, 12:32:55 PMwhatever the specification, it should never prevent the entire train from loading. and in this case, the train is 4 tiles long, the station is 5 tiles long.
Quote from: Ranran on September 20, 2020, 01:06:15 PMeven if there is a cargo attribute, if the capacity is 0, the cargo will not be loaded
Quote from: Ranran on September 20, 2020, 01:06:15 PMif the cargo stored at the station exceeds the capacity, it will not be loaded.
Quote from: Ranran on September 20, 2020, 01:06:15 PMI know the coverage constraint of 3 tiles for cargo may not actually be 3 tiles
Quote from: Ranran on September 20, 2020, 01:06:15 PMRecently, just_in_time has changed
QuoteThe capacity is 10 for each wagon, so this should not matter.
QuoteI'm not sure what this means. What coverage constraint?
Quote from: Ranran on September 21, 2020, 12:52:28 PMWhat I wanted to say is that either station is congested or has zero capacity (but has cargo attributes) and cannot accept cargo.
Quote from: Ranran on September 21, 2020, 12:52:28 PMThe information on whether the factory and the station are connected is ambiguous (diagonally) and it is uncertain whether the 3 tiles ahead are connected.
Quote from: Ranran on September 21, 2020, 12:52:28 PMCargo may be waiting for a reverse route that does not arrive endlessly.
Quote from: jamespetts on September 26, 2020, 11:00:00 PMRanran - can you remind me of the thread in which you reported what you believe to be a related issue relating to convoy choice for freight loading?
Quote from: Ranran on October 22, 2020, 02:45:38 PMHas the factory or related factories been upgraded in the past? (It's just a speculation of possibility.)
Quote from: jamespetts on October 23, 2020, 05:42:43 PMCan I check that we have eliminated the mixed load prohibition as being a (legitimate) cause of the reported behaviour?
Quote from: Freahk on October 24, 2020, 03:45:39 PMI'd first test this on a pakset base, simply commenting out the load prohibition on those cars. If it works, we know it's most likely related and it's worth to have a more detailled look in this direction.
Quote from: Freahk on October 26, 2020, 01:55:22 PMThat's good news! Now we know it's very likely a bug in mixed load prohibition, so it should be easier to fix.
QuoteI'd expect your observations about the first few lorries to be related to the line preference feature.. Even if there are multiple routes in between two stations, pax will only use a line that differs from the calculated "optimal" one in some cases. From my experience, this feature does usually work well, but there are some cases where it fails.If everything loads fine now, it indicates that your new route is now considered to be the best option.
Quote from: Ranran on October 26, 2020, 02:39:12 PMIf mixload prohibition is the cause, it's usually not seen, so it's important what condition triggers it.For example, choose signal, standby by schedule, if the loading process is different, I may not have added the mixload prohibition loading process to that part.